The Mysterious Unfolding of a Crisis: A Closer Look at the Dangers of Insourced Immigration
- Karen Brittingham-Edmond

- Nov 28, 2025
- 4 min read
28 November 2025
National Security & Immigration Policy

Washington D.C. - In a shocking act of violence that echoes through the corridors of power and society, two members of the West Virginia National Guard were ambushed in Washington, D.C., on 26 November 2025. The tragic death of Army Spc. Sarah Beckstrom, just 20 years old, and the critical condition of Air Force Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe, 24, stirred a chilling narrative that transcends mere headlines. Eyewitness accounts describe a "clear ambush"—a calculated attack executed with precision, leaving the nation grappling with more than just grief.
The suspect, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, whose path to the U.S. seemingly aligns with a troubled narrative of immigration policies, once worked alongside the CIA in Afghanistan. This apparent paradox—a man who once served their interests now turning against them—sows uncertainty and curiosity. How did a legal immigrant, once considered a partner in a foreign war, become the face of domestic turmoil?
As the investigation unfolds, it weaves a complex web linking insourced immigrants to broader socio-political movements. The Sanctuary Movement, traditionally supported by various factions including non-radical Republicans, finds itself scrutinized under the harsh light of this incident. Was this violence an unintended consequence of a political strategy aimed at reshaping demographics, masquerading as compassion for those in need?
The unfortunate death of Beckstrom, hailed a hero, serves as a poignant reminder of the vulnerabilities that come with this complex fabric of alliances and policies. Yet, we must ask—who truly bears responsibility for this turmoil? The answer doesn't lie solely in the hands of Lakanwal but echoes back to the American populace. It was the very citizens who corroborated with the Sanctuary Movement's implications, hoping to replace established Black citizen populations with a new wave of immigrant thinking shaped by caste ideologies.

This unfamiliar bridge creates a false narrative where insourced populations are delicately placed in opposition to Black American communities—both groups poised to fight for their rights in a land fraught with a history of oppression. Notably, while immigrants, both legal and illegal, benefit from rights fought for by Black Americans—human rights, civil rights, affirmative action—their gratitude was never shared towards Black citizens. But instead replaced by an unyielding quest for demographic dominance that threatens to fragment the nation further that correlates to their caste system thinking methodology. This will be explained in the article later. How The Caste System Shaped Racial Inequality in Latin America
A reflective conversation on the implications of sanctuary policies reveals a disturbing truth. As the U.S. grapples with its identity, guiding policies crafted under the pretense of altruism could inadvertently prop up extremist ideologies. These dynamics not only introduce chaos and violence but also pave the way for political machinations, exploited by activists and politicians seeking to realign voting blocs and solidify power, culminating in the unprecedented dual victories of Donald Trump from 2016 through 2024.

Flash Back - It's Time to Remember
The strategic plan, akin to the Sanctuary Movement, has been enacted by non-radical Republicans. Echo's writers argue that the American public affiliated with the non-Radical Republican Party plus Confederate sympathizers, who openly supported the Sanctuary Movement participants, are to blame for these reckless issues. Their goal was to replace Black citizen populations with immigrants who support caste-based ideologies aligning with White Supremacist beliefs.
This has created a scenario where subpopulations of insourced immigrants, extreme racist citizens, and Black residents in the U.S. identify as "I no Black," while relying on human rights, civil rights, equal opportunity rights, affirmative action rights, including grants and SBA Loans, which Black Americans have historically fought and died for. These rights were secured by Black Americans, direct descendants of North American chattel slavery survivors, North American Civil War soldiers' direct descendants, and those impacted or lost relatives as a result of the North American Indian East Coast removal act. In contrast, insourced illegal and legal immigrants have received these rights from local, state, and federal governments, rights fought for by Black citizens.
This has been part of a broader strategy by the Christian Coalitions and Southern Confederate Evangelicals to gerrymander strong Black citizen voting blocs into Latino or Middle Eastern voting blocs, ultimately aiding Donald Trump's election to office twice. This plan was systematically developed and executed between 1980 and 2025.
In Conclusion:

As this tragic tale continues to evolve, it lays bare a deeply entrenched struggle within American society, rooted in its history of exclusion and the continuous endeavor for liberation and equality. The incidents surrounding Lakanwal and the fallen soldiers ignite a labyrinth of narratives that compel us to reassess our policies, our allegiances, and ultimately, our collective conscience. What unfolds next will shape not only the lives of those affected but the very future of America itself. Each story and loss calls into question the moral fabric of our society and the true meaning of sanctuary.










Comments